604-689-7555 or 1-800-689-2322
VIEW ACTIVE CLASS ACTIONS

Class Action Updates

September 23, 2024

Please note that the proposed class is limited to individuals or entities who have a contract with Navitax that contains the following “Term” clause: Term…

August 30, 2024

Justice Coval has approved an Opt Out procedure for the above matter. The deadline to opt out is November 28, 2024. Please click on the…

July 10, 2024

On April 16, 2024, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice approved the settlement agreement entered into with the Tetra Tech Defendants and set the Gatos…

REFERRALS
INFORMATION FOR LAWYERS LOOKING FOR LEGAL EXPERTISE IN BC AND CANADA

Proposed Class Action

CFM Lawyers LLP (“CFM”) and Will Barristers: Morin & Miller LLP have joined with Sutts Strosberg LLP and Glyn Hotz, to pursue a class action lawsuit on behalf of all passengers on board Air France Flight 358. The lawsuit has been commenced in the Superior Court of Ontario against Air France, the Greater Toronto Airports Authority, Nav Canada, the Pilot and Co-pilot of Flight 358, Airbus S.A.S. and Goodrich. The lawsuit seeks damages for all passengers and their family members including damages for personal injury (which may include pain, suffering and emotional trauma) and any losses or expenses resulting from the destruction of personal property. A copy of the Statement of Claim can be viewed by clicking on this link:

Air France Statement of Claim

On June 1, 2006, the Superior Court of Ontario ordered that the action may proceed as a class action. The class action will be lead by J.J. Camp, K.C. and Joe Fiorante, K.C. of CFM and Paul Miller of Will Barristers: Morin & Miller LLP.

A copy of the Statements of Defence filed by the Defendants can be viewed by clicking on these links:Airbus Statement of Defence

The case involves a number of important and complex issues of law and fact including the following:

  • the extent of an air carrier’s liability under the Montreal and Warsaw Conventions to pay damages to passengers for any emotional distress or other psychological illness suffered by passengers
  • the duties and responsibilities of air traffic control service providers under Canadian law
  • the duties and responsibilities of airport operators under Canadian law
  • the jurisdiction of the Canadian courts under the Montreal and Warsaw Conventions
  • the lack of technologies at LBPIA to provide advance warning against dangerous wind conditions produced by thunderstorms

 

BACK TO TOP